How did James Mill describe India?

According to him India was backward and had unacceptable culture. With various superstitious beliefs prevailing in the country, the people were very arrogant. He further organized the country into three eras and stated that India grew or made changes only in terms of religious practices.

How did James Mill classify Indian history?

In 1817, James Mill, a Scottish economist and political philosopher, published a massive three-volume work, A History of British India. In this he divided Indian history into three periods – Hindu, Muslim and British. This periodisation came to be widely accepted.

What was James Mill opinion about the British rule in India?

He was born on 6 April 1773. He wrote The History of British India. He was the supporter of British rule in India, because he preiodized the Indian history as Hindu and Muslim like British period. He was the first writer to divide Indian history into three parts; Hindu, Muslim and British.

Who was James Mill for Class 8?

Who was James Mill? Answer. He was a Scottish economist and political philosopher and is known for his book A History of British India.

How did James Mill View India in short?

How did James Mill view India? Answer: James Mill did not cherish any positive idea about India. He was of the opinion that all Asian societies were at a lower level of civilisation than Europe. According to his telling of history, before the British came to India, the Hindu and the Muslim despots ruled the country.

IMPORTANT:  Which country has most companies in India?

Why did British conduct surveys in India?

Answer: The british conduct so many surveys in india because they wanted to be famous all over the india and as well as the whole world by the future people . They conducted surveys in order to check their spread of business all over the india. They neeed all the future people to know about their east india company.

Who wrote a history of British India?

Why did James Mill attacked the Orientalist?

James Mill severely attacked the Orientalists. He declared that he British effort should not be to teach what the natives wanted, or what they respected, in order to please them and “win a place in their heart”. The aim of education ought to be to teach what was useful and practical.

Dreams of India